![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
haters to the left
Mar. 25th, 2011 03:19 pmSomething that made my day. FUCKING YES. I'm reposting the article content here, because I want to keep this forever as something to read. And now, I need to work on some fanfiction. ANDERS!
Bioware Tells Straight Men to "Get Over" Being Hit on By Gay Men in "Dragon Age 2"
Posted by Michael Jensen, Editor on March 24, 2011 :
Earlier this month we reported that Bioware's Dragon Age 2 was incredibly gay inclusive because it included an option for gay romance and allowed characters to flirt with each other regardless of gender. In news that should surprise no one, not everyone playing Dragon Age 2 was thrilled by the change. In fact, one gamer started a forum thread on the Bioware site complaining about having to put up with men hitting on him. Gee, now he knows how pretty much every woman in the world has felt at some point having to put up with unwanted advances from straight men. Poor baby.
The gamer also accuses Bioware of neglecting their main demographic — The Straight Male Gamer. Because if there is any group that has been ignored in American culture — especially in video games — it's the straight male contingent.
What was Bioware's reaction? Basically, they told him to get over it and that they weren't going to cater to his need for heterosexual privilege. Here is the response from a Bioware staff member named David Gaider (via Phyrra):
The romances in the game are not for "the straight male gamer". They're for everyone. We have a lot of fans, many of whom are neither straight nor male, and they deserve no less attention. We have good numbers, after all, on the number of people who actually used similar sorts of content in DAO and thus don't need to resort to anecdotal evidence to support our idea that their numbers are not insignificant... and that's ignoring the idea that they don't have just as much right to play the kind of game they wish as anyone else. The "rights" of anyone with regards to a game are murky at best, but anyone who takes that stance must apply it equally to both the minority as well as the majority. The majority has no inherent "right" to get more options than anyone else.
More than that, I would question anyone deciding they speak for "the straight male gamer" just as much as someone claiming they speak for "all RPG fans", "all female fans" or even "all gay fans". You don't. If you wish to express your personal desires, then do so. I have no doubt that any opinion expressed on these forums is shared by many others, but since none of them have elected a spokesperson you're better off not trying to be one. If your attempt is to convince BioWare developers, I can tell you that you do in fact make your opinion less convincing by doing so.
And if there is any doubt why such an opinion might be met with hostility, it has to do with privilege. You can write it off as "political correctness" if you wish, but the truth is that privilege always lies with the majority. They're so used to being catered to that they see the lack of catering as an imbalance. They don't see anything wrong with having things set up to suit them, what's everyone's fuss all about? That's the way it should be, any everyone else should be used to not getting what they want.
The truth is that making a romance available for both genders is far less costly than creating an entirely new one. Does it create some issues of implementation? Sure-- but anything you try on this front is going to have its issues, and inevitably you'll always leave someone out in the cold. In this case, are all straight males left out in the cold? Not at all. There are romances available for them just the same as anyone else. Not all straight males require that their content be exclusive, after all, and you can see that even on this thread.
Would I do it again? I don't know. I doubt I would have Anders make the first move again-- at the time, I thought that requiring all romances to have Hawke initiate everything was the unrealistic part. Even if someone decides that this makes everyone "unrealistically" bisexual, however, or they can't handle the idea that the character might be bisexual if they were another PC... I don't see that as a big concern, to be honest. Romances are never one-size-fits-all, and even for those who don't mind the sexuality issue there's no guarantee they'll find a character they even want to romance. That's why romances are optional content. It's such a personal issue that we'll never be able to please everyone. The very best we can do is give everyone a little bit of choice, and that's what we tried here.
And the person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the one who deserves it least. And that's my opinion, expressed as politely as possible.
Kudos to Bioware for not bowing to public pressure from the "majority." (Thanks to AE reader Alessar for bringing this to our attention.)
Bioware Tells Straight Men to "Get Over" Being Hit on By Gay Men in "Dragon Age 2"
Posted by Michael Jensen, Editor on March 24, 2011 :
Earlier this month we reported that Bioware's Dragon Age 2 was incredibly gay inclusive because it included an option for gay romance and allowed characters to flirt with each other regardless of gender. In news that should surprise no one, not everyone playing Dragon Age 2 was thrilled by the change. In fact, one gamer started a forum thread on the Bioware site complaining about having to put up with men hitting on him. Gee, now he knows how pretty much every woman in the world has felt at some point having to put up with unwanted advances from straight men. Poor baby.
The gamer also accuses Bioware of neglecting their main demographic — The Straight Male Gamer. Because if there is any group that has been ignored in American culture — especially in video games — it's the straight male contingent.
What was Bioware's reaction? Basically, they told him to get over it and that they weren't going to cater to his need for heterosexual privilege. Here is the response from a Bioware staff member named David Gaider (via Phyrra):
The romances in the game are not for "the straight male gamer". They're for everyone. We have a lot of fans, many of whom are neither straight nor male, and they deserve no less attention. We have good numbers, after all, on the number of people who actually used similar sorts of content in DAO and thus don't need to resort to anecdotal evidence to support our idea that their numbers are not insignificant... and that's ignoring the idea that they don't have just as much right to play the kind of game they wish as anyone else. The "rights" of anyone with regards to a game are murky at best, but anyone who takes that stance must apply it equally to both the minority as well as the majority. The majority has no inherent "right" to get more options than anyone else.
More than that, I would question anyone deciding they speak for "the straight male gamer" just as much as someone claiming they speak for "all RPG fans", "all female fans" or even "all gay fans". You don't. If you wish to express your personal desires, then do so. I have no doubt that any opinion expressed on these forums is shared by many others, but since none of them have elected a spokesperson you're better off not trying to be one. If your attempt is to convince BioWare developers, I can tell you that you do in fact make your opinion less convincing by doing so.
And if there is any doubt why such an opinion might be met with hostility, it has to do with privilege. You can write it off as "political correctness" if you wish, but the truth is that privilege always lies with the majority. They're so used to being catered to that they see the lack of catering as an imbalance. They don't see anything wrong with having things set up to suit them, what's everyone's fuss all about? That's the way it should be, any everyone else should be used to not getting what they want.
The truth is that making a romance available for both genders is far less costly than creating an entirely new one. Does it create some issues of implementation? Sure-- but anything you try on this front is going to have its issues, and inevitably you'll always leave someone out in the cold. In this case, are all straight males left out in the cold? Not at all. There are romances available for them just the same as anyone else. Not all straight males require that their content be exclusive, after all, and you can see that even on this thread.
Would I do it again? I don't know. I doubt I would have Anders make the first move again-- at the time, I thought that requiring all romances to have Hawke initiate everything was the unrealistic part. Even if someone decides that this makes everyone "unrealistically" bisexual, however, or they can't handle the idea that the character might be bisexual if they were another PC... I don't see that as a big concern, to be honest. Romances are never one-size-fits-all, and even for those who don't mind the sexuality issue there's no guarantee they'll find a character they even want to romance. That's why romances are optional content. It's such a personal issue that we'll never be able to please everyone. The very best we can do is give everyone a little bit of choice, and that's what we tried here.
And the person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the one who deserves it least. And that's my opinion, expressed as politely as possible.
Kudos to Bioware for not bowing to public pressure from the "majority." (Thanks to AE reader Alessar for bringing this to our attention.)