three (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
threeplusfire) wrote2004-03-21 01:19 pm
threeplusfire) wrote2004-03-21 01:19 pm
(no subject)
I shouldn't read the internet so soon after waking. It only pisses me off.
Fuck that vegan moral superiority bullshit. There's something delightfully evil about knowing that in order to sustain large crops of grains you end up with a lot of dead field mice. Oh, I am so going to use that line on the next self righteous vegan who tries to make me feel guilty for eating meat.
Thankfully my friends who are vegetarian/vegan/whatever who are not militant about their choices and don't feel the need to run around trying to guilt others into adopting their behaviour. I will kindly eat their share of the world's meat so they won't have to. Everyone wins!
Fuck that vegan moral superiority bullshit. There's something delightfully evil about knowing that in order to sustain large crops of grains you end up with a lot of dead field mice. Oh, I am so going to use that line on the next self righteous vegan who tries to make me feel guilty for eating meat.
Thankfully my friends who are vegetarian/vegan/whatever who are not militant about their choices and don't feel the need to run around trying to guilt others into adopting their behaviour. I will kindly eat their share of the world's meat so they won't have to. Everyone wins!
no subject
changing our outlook of meat to be more in line with this, would do a lot to negate the "need" for commercialized animal production, which in turn would greatly reduce the amount of water and useful food essentially wasted in our agricultural system.
but doing so would also reduce the beef industries profits and undo all the work they've paid for to convince everyone it's what's for dinner. as the oprah case shows, they're happy to spend millions to protect their billions from any perceived threat whatsoever.
no subject