three (
threeplusfire) wrote2009-05-25 01:09 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
oh people, please
From a review of 300:
"over all a great movie, if you havent seen it buy it, its worth it for action fans who love the mid-evil type era."
I had to pause for a moment to allow my brain to recover before I continued working.
"over all a great movie, if you havent seen it buy it, its worth it for action fans who love the mid-evil type era."
I had to pause for a moment to allow my brain to recover before I continued working.
no subject
And a refresher course in World History (let alone discussions about violence, orientalism, etc)?
And basic grammar?
I'd be lying if I said none of the papers by freshmen I've graded didn't look this bad, though... They learn really quickly not to write like this. Red-hot pokers, tasers, leeches, etc. I'm now rambling about occasionally-effective torture as a means to correct grammar: a sure sign I'm sleep-deprived.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
That didn't last. But then again, people weren't using it everyday.
Sigh.
Ekatarina, who owns a large dictionary and used it twice today
no subject
it's really depressing to read something like that, and know that not only was the writer sincere in hir ignorance, but there are many many people who wouldn't see anything at all wrong with the statement
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
HALP.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Oh, lord.
no subject
no subject
For dramatic tension, the full-evil eras are usually pretty evocative. I mean, the no-evil eras don't really have a lot of action going on, did they?
Or wait, have we had one of those yet?