![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
so full of rage
Aug. 5th, 2008 01:58 pmhttp://www.boulderweekly.com/20080731/coverstory.html
Reading this article, I was overwhelmed with the urge to punch Kristi Burton in the face. Things like this fill me with rage. No one is looking forward and excited about having an abortion. but sometimes they are necessary. It's awful, it's hard, it's painful. I think unless you've been in that person's place you have no right to judge them for their choices.
Excerpt:
Kristi Burton, 20, a resident of Peyton, Colo., is the public face of Amendment 48. Burton told the press that the idea of fighting for the unborn came to her when she was sick in bed at the age of 13.
“Me and a lot of my friends want to do what we can to create a culture of life,” she says, using the oft-repeated favorite phrase of fundamentalist Christians.
Burton claims she hasn’t really thought about the implications of the proposed constitutional change and is happy to leave the fallout to the courts. She also says she sees a future for herself in public policy. (Because that's EXACTLY the kind of person we need in public policy! Someone who doesn't think about implications or the long term!!)
If her interest in public policy should one day include considering the impact of the policies she hopes to enact, she could study the emerging situation in Nicaragua, where in November 2006 the conservative government banned all abortions for all reasons, including rape, incest and the life and health of the mother. Prior to this change, a woman could have a therapeutic abortion if her life or health were in danger or if the fetus were malformed in such a way that it would not live after birth.
But now any doctor who performs an abortion for those reasons can be sent to prison. Likewise, a woman who has an abortion, even to protect her health, can also be prosecuted and sent to prison.
According to Human Rights Watch, an international nonprofit organization that has studied the situation in Nicaragua, the law has resulted in an increase in preventable women’s deaths from causes related to pregnancy. The organization’s findings were published in October 2007 in a report titled “Over Their Dead Bodies.”
“Although it appears that actual prosecutions are rare,” the report states, “the ban has very real consequences that fall into three main categories: denial of access to life- or health-saving abortion services; denial or delay in access to other obstetric emergency care; and a pronounced fear of seeking treatment for obstetrical emergencies. The net result has been avoidable deaths.”
The report details instances in which doctors have hesitated to treat women suffering from ectopic pregnancies, uterine hemorrhaging or even life-threatening cancers because doing so would either terminate her pregnancy or put it at risk, thus leaving both doctor and hospital vulnerable to prosecution.
Though the Nicaraguan Health Ministry issued a number of mandatory protocols regarding obstetrical emergencies hoping to address the unforeseen consequences of the blanket abortion ban, many hospitals are still hesitant to enact them for fear that the protocols are still open to interpretation. So, although the ministry calls for immediate termination of ectopic pregnancies, Human Rights Watch documented cases in which women died of ectopic pregnancies that went untreated due to the hospital’s or doctor’s fear of prosecution.
The report also documents a very real fear among women who miscarry naturally that they will be accused of having an abortion if they seek medical treatment. Again, women have died.
And yet, for all of this, the law hasn’t stopped women from seeking abortions. As the report further documents, the law has simply resulted in more women dying from the procedure.
Women are suffering in other ways, as well. Before the ban was in place, a woman found to be pregnant with a badly deformed, nonviable fetus — a fetus afflicted with congenital deformities such as anacephaly (missing most of the brain) or trisomy-18 (a complex of deformities incompatible with life) — could terminate her pregnancy. Now, she is required to carry the pregnancy to term and endure labor on behalf of a fetus that cannot possibly survive for long outside her uterus.
“To make a woman who knows that she has an anacephalic child in her womb carry it to term and make her suffer though giving birth — a patient who sees her child born with those problems suffers devastating psychological consequences,” an obstetrician from a major hospital in Managua told Human Rights Watch. “What we normally do when there are malformations incompatible with life is to terminate the pregnancy when we detect it. But now, according to the law, it cannot be done. We have encountered various cases of young girls whose pregnancies we could not terminate; so we told her... that she has a pregnancy, that the baby is not going to live, and that it will die when it is born. But we can only explain; there is nothing we can do.”
Although it’s hard to imagine the American public, even anti-abortion extremists, tolerating the medical neglect of women in the name of protecting life, there are those in the United States who would use the force of law to ensure that women give birth to badly deformed, doomed babies rather than aborting them.
Dr. Andrew Toledo, an OB/GYN and reproductive endocrinologist who practices in Georgia, listened to such people testify in a subcommittee hearing regarding a referendum that anti-abortion extremists hoped to get onto his state’s ballot. The referendum, like Amendment 48, would also have protected life from the moment of fertilization.
“There were countless couples who got up and told their story about how they had to have an abortion because of a child that was anacephalic or deformed in some terrible way,” Toledo says. “It didn’t move these people at all. They didn’t care. They just didn’t care. It didn’t matter if the woman was raped. It didn’t matter if it was incest. It didn’t matter if the girl was under age.”
Taking away a woman's right her own reproductive organs, her very biological processes, her ability to make her own choices about when, where and how to have children, how to manage her fertility - it is repugnant. That choice is the responsibility of the person or persons involved in that situation. These extremists run around acting like there's a secret conspiracy to put birth control in the tap water, that doctors grab girls off the street and forcibly abort pregnancies. It makes me crazy that groups who claim they are protecting life would so happily do things to cause preventable deaths and do little to no actual work on caring for the lives of children and people in need. If the money spent on this repulsive and ignorant campaign was directed towards children in foster care, adoption, or preventing abuse & neglect we could have a better world. Seriously, do you ever see any of these folk adopting children? Or, heaven forfend!, adopting non-white children? I never have.
People who would deny women any and all abilities to control their own fertility might as well go back to living in the Dark Ages. They can turn in their car keys, phones, medications, disposable diapers, sneakers, deodorant, washing machines, microwaves, air conditioning, televisions, snack foods and duct tape at the gate before they start living in caves or thatch & mud walled homes.
I'm so angry my hands are shaking. I need to go scrub the bath tub or punch a hole in the wall.
Reading this article, I was overwhelmed with the urge to punch Kristi Burton in the face. Things like this fill me with rage. No one is looking forward and excited about having an abortion. but sometimes they are necessary. It's awful, it's hard, it's painful. I think unless you've been in that person's place you have no right to judge them for their choices.
Excerpt:
Kristi Burton, 20, a resident of Peyton, Colo., is the public face of Amendment 48. Burton told the press that the idea of fighting for the unborn came to her when she was sick in bed at the age of 13.
“Me and a lot of my friends want to do what we can to create a culture of life,” she says, using the oft-repeated favorite phrase of fundamentalist Christians.
Burton claims she hasn’t really thought about the implications of the proposed constitutional change and is happy to leave the fallout to the courts. She also says she sees a future for herself in public policy. (Because that's EXACTLY the kind of person we need in public policy! Someone who doesn't think about implications or the long term!!)
If her interest in public policy should one day include considering the impact of the policies she hopes to enact, she could study the emerging situation in Nicaragua, where in November 2006 the conservative government banned all abortions for all reasons, including rape, incest and the life and health of the mother. Prior to this change, a woman could have a therapeutic abortion if her life or health were in danger or if the fetus were malformed in such a way that it would not live after birth.
But now any doctor who performs an abortion for those reasons can be sent to prison. Likewise, a woman who has an abortion, even to protect her health, can also be prosecuted and sent to prison.
According to Human Rights Watch, an international nonprofit organization that has studied the situation in Nicaragua, the law has resulted in an increase in preventable women’s deaths from causes related to pregnancy. The organization’s findings were published in October 2007 in a report titled “Over Their Dead Bodies.”
“Although it appears that actual prosecutions are rare,” the report states, “the ban has very real consequences that fall into three main categories: denial of access to life- or health-saving abortion services; denial or delay in access to other obstetric emergency care; and a pronounced fear of seeking treatment for obstetrical emergencies. The net result has been avoidable deaths.”
The report details instances in which doctors have hesitated to treat women suffering from ectopic pregnancies, uterine hemorrhaging or even life-threatening cancers because doing so would either terminate her pregnancy or put it at risk, thus leaving both doctor and hospital vulnerable to prosecution.
Though the Nicaraguan Health Ministry issued a number of mandatory protocols regarding obstetrical emergencies hoping to address the unforeseen consequences of the blanket abortion ban, many hospitals are still hesitant to enact them for fear that the protocols are still open to interpretation. So, although the ministry calls for immediate termination of ectopic pregnancies, Human Rights Watch documented cases in which women died of ectopic pregnancies that went untreated due to the hospital’s or doctor’s fear of prosecution.
The report also documents a very real fear among women who miscarry naturally that they will be accused of having an abortion if they seek medical treatment. Again, women have died.
And yet, for all of this, the law hasn’t stopped women from seeking abortions. As the report further documents, the law has simply resulted in more women dying from the procedure.
Women are suffering in other ways, as well. Before the ban was in place, a woman found to be pregnant with a badly deformed, nonviable fetus — a fetus afflicted with congenital deformities such as anacephaly (missing most of the brain) or trisomy-18 (a complex of deformities incompatible with life) — could terminate her pregnancy. Now, she is required to carry the pregnancy to term and endure labor on behalf of a fetus that cannot possibly survive for long outside her uterus.
“To make a woman who knows that she has an anacephalic child in her womb carry it to term and make her suffer though giving birth — a patient who sees her child born with those problems suffers devastating psychological consequences,” an obstetrician from a major hospital in Managua told Human Rights Watch. “What we normally do when there are malformations incompatible with life is to terminate the pregnancy when we detect it. But now, according to the law, it cannot be done. We have encountered various cases of young girls whose pregnancies we could not terminate; so we told her... that she has a pregnancy, that the baby is not going to live, and that it will die when it is born. But we can only explain; there is nothing we can do.”
Although it’s hard to imagine the American public, even anti-abortion extremists, tolerating the medical neglect of women in the name of protecting life, there are those in the United States who would use the force of law to ensure that women give birth to badly deformed, doomed babies rather than aborting them.
Dr. Andrew Toledo, an OB/GYN and reproductive endocrinologist who practices in Georgia, listened to such people testify in a subcommittee hearing regarding a referendum that anti-abortion extremists hoped to get onto his state’s ballot. The referendum, like Amendment 48, would also have protected life from the moment of fertilization.
“There were countless couples who got up and told their story about how they had to have an abortion because of a child that was anacephalic or deformed in some terrible way,” Toledo says. “It didn’t move these people at all. They didn’t care. They just didn’t care. It didn’t matter if the woman was raped. It didn’t matter if it was incest. It didn’t matter if the girl was under age.”
Taking away a woman's right her own reproductive organs, her very biological processes, her ability to make her own choices about when, where and how to have children, how to manage her fertility - it is repugnant. That choice is the responsibility of the person or persons involved in that situation. These extremists run around acting like there's a secret conspiracy to put birth control in the tap water, that doctors grab girls off the street and forcibly abort pregnancies. It makes me crazy that groups who claim they are protecting life would so happily do things to cause preventable deaths and do little to no actual work on caring for the lives of children and people in need. If the money spent on this repulsive and ignorant campaign was directed towards children in foster care, adoption, or preventing abuse & neglect we could have a better world. Seriously, do you ever see any of these folk adopting children? Or, heaven forfend!, adopting non-white children? I never have.
People who would deny women any and all abilities to control their own fertility might as well go back to living in the Dark Ages. They can turn in their car keys, phones, medications, disposable diapers, sneakers, deodorant, washing machines, microwaves, air conditioning, televisions, snack foods and duct tape at the gate before they start living in caves or thatch & mud walled homes.
I'm so angry my hands are shaking. I need to go scrub the bath tub or punch a hole in the wall.